![]() Category:
Financial
Responsible Office:
|
Procedure Title:
Investment Objectives and Guidelines, SUNY Statement of
Document Number:
7450
Effective Date: May 13, 2008
This procedure item applies to: State-Operated Campuses
|
The State University of New York’s (University) Board of Trustees' (Board) Finance and Administration Committee (the "Committee") has been entrusted by the Board with the responsibility of determining the University’s investment policies and practices, subject to the general supervision of the Board.
The Statement of Investment Objectives and Guidelines (Guidelines) apply to the University’s Productive Endowment Fund (SUEF), which is comprised primarily of funds that have been donated over the years to the University and its constituent campuses, and the accumulated earnings on these sums, and such other funds that the University has authority to invest, manage, and oversee.
A cash equivalent portfolio is managed for the University by the New York State Comptroller, which by agreement with that office, represents the cash income earned (i.e., interest and dividends) that is transferred to the state treasury at the beginning of each quarter sufficient to meet the budgeted expenditures under the SUEF spending plan relative to the ensuing quarter.
The Guidelines represent the formal document governing the investment of SUEF assets, which is communicated to the investment managers for their use in developing an appropriate investment program, and to the Board and Committee for their use in exercising fiduciary responsibility in overseeing the SUEF. This document will also be used as the basis for future investment performance measurement and evaluation. The objectives are formulated in response to the following:
The primary investment objective of the SUEF is to preserve the real (inflation-adjusted) purchasing power of fund assets while providing a relatively predictable, stable, and constant (in real terms) stream of earnings in line with spending needs.
Financial objectives for the SUEF are established to provide for sufficient income to meet the income requirements of the beneficial interests of the SUEF, as well as to provide for continued capital appreciation of the SUEF. While there cannot be complete assurance that the defined objectives will be realized, the parameters that have been established are reasonable and attainable.
The SUEF is expected to generate a return of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) plus 5% over a 7 to 10 year horizon to preserve the spending power of the SUEF. Relative performance of the total portfolio will be measured as follows:
The SUEF shall be diversified both by asset class (e.g., equities, bonds, and alternative investments) and within asset classes (e.g., within equities by investment style, economic sector, industry, and size). The purpose of diversification is to provide reasonable assurance that no single security or class of securities will have a disproportionate impact on the total SUEF.
I. Responsible Parties and Fiduciary Duties
The State University of New York’s (University) Board of Trustees (Board), approved and authorized the retention of services of investment advisors, consultants, and custodians to provide services in relation to the investment management of the University’s Productive Endowment Fund (SUEF). Services of a consultant may also be retained to provide advice on specifically defined projects, and to perform periodic evaluative reviews in connection with the portfolio. Pursuant to contracts entered into with the investment advisors, consultants, and custodians, services are to be rendered for stated periods of up to five years, after which the University will solicit proposals for such service through a competitive process in accordance with procurement policies and procedures of the University and the State of New York. Such contracts may be terminated upon 30 days written notice by either the University or the other party (investment advisor, consultant or custodian), with the consent of the University.
B. Finance and Administration Committee
The University Board’s Finance and Administration Committee (Committee) has been entrusted by the Board with the responsibility of determining the University’s investment policy, subject to the general supervision of the Board. Specifically, the Committee’s responsibilities encompass the following:
1. Review of Spending and Fund Value
All spending requirements are subject to a formula approved by the Board. The current formula, adopted by the Board by Resolution No. 99-54, is as follows:
The spending allocation will increase 5% of the prior year’s allocation on a per unit basis, except under the following circumstances. If the SUEF performs poorly, so that SUEF spending (calculated at 5% more than the prior year’s spending) would exceed 6% of average market value per unit for the three prior calendar years, spending would be frozen at the prior year’s amount. If the SUEF performs well, so that spending (calculated at 5% more than the prior year’s spending) would be less than 4.5% of average market value per unit for the three prior calendar years, spending would be increased to equal 5% of the average market value per unit for the three prior calendar years.
The university controller shall submit to the Committee a report which compares spending levels for the ensuing fiscal year calculated in accordance with the SUEF spending formula (1) against spending levels calculated at 5% of the average of twelve quarterly market values for the most recent three calendar years, (2) at 4% of the average market value of the SUEF portfolio for the five fiscal years ending prior to the year of calculation, and (3) against spending levels calculated at 5% of the average market value of the SUEF for the three and five fiscal years ending prior to the year of calculation.
At least annually, the Committee will review the growth of the SUEF in nominal and real dollar terms as well as the level of income generated by the SUEF, to determine the performance of the SUEF in light of the spending requirements of the University to be supported by the SUEF.
2. Review of Investment Objectives
The achievement of investment objectives will be reviewed on an annual basis by the Committee. This review will focus on the continued feasibility of achieving the objectives and the continued appropriateness of the investment strategy for achieving the objectives. It is not expected that the investment strategy will change frequently; in particular, short-term changes in the financial markets should not require an adjustment in the investment strategy.
C. University Oversight of SUEF
The Board shall designate a senior University official to assist in the daily oversight of the SUEF’s investments and related activities, including the following duties:
Currently, the Board has assigned this responsibility to the vice chancellor for finance and business, or designee, which is the university controller.
Each appointed investment manager will do the following:
Each investment manager will advise the Committee, university controller, and the investment consultant promptly of any event that is likely to adversely impact, to a significant degree, the management, professionalism, integrity, or financial position of the funds under management, including events such as the following:
The assets of the SUEF will be held by an institution designated as the custodian, which shall manage, control, collect, and use the assets of the SUEF in accordance with the terms of a separate custodial agreement, as well as the terms of these Guidelines.
The University recognizes that accurate and timely completion of custodial functions is necessary for effective investment management and accurate records. The basic duties of the custodian are as follows:
The Committee, the university controller, and the investment consultant will be advised promptly of the listed events occurring within the custodian's organization:
The Board may retain the services of a third-party investment consultant to provide expert advice and recommendations to help the Board and the Committee discharge its fiduciary responsibilities in furtherance of the SUEF’s goals and objectives. Such services provided by the investment consultant will include the following:
The State University believes that the best measure of performance can be achieved on a total return basis by investment discipline. This means that the investment portfolio will be broken down into clearly identified, separate investment strategies that include seven distinct roles for publicly traded securities: equity – large cap equity-active, large cap equity – passive index, small cap equity - active, non-style specific US equity - active, international equity - active, emerging markets equity – passive index, and fixed income – core opportunistic – active. The purpose of this structure is to maintain a diverse range of asset classes in the total SUEF portfolio, especially with respect to the equity style and market capitalization spectrum. Additionally, to capitalize on a more diversified range of investments, several alternative asset strategies with lower correlations to the publicly-traded equity strategies in the portfolio will be employed. These alternative strategies will be hedge fund of funds, real estate, and commodities.
Each asset class strategy will be assigned to one or more investment managers with the requisite expertise, and a specific dollar amount will be allocated to these investment managers for this purpose in conformance with the target percentages on Chart A below. Each specific investment strategy will be measured against an appropriate performance benchmark.
At times the portfolio may not have an investment manager dedicated to each asset class strategy (i.e., large, mid, and small cap; value and growth, etc.). In these periods, the underlying holdings of all of the managers will be reviewed in aggregate to ensure that the overall investment portfolio maintains broad diversification across the market capitalization spectrum (i.e., large, mid and small cap), industry sectors, and styles (i.e., value, growth).
Chart A
|
9-19 |
||||
|
1-11 | ||||
|
5-15 | ||||
| International-Active |
41 | 27 |
N/A | 17-37 |
| Emerging Markets-Index | 8 | 5 | N/A | 0-10 |
Strategy |
% Equity | Target % Aggregate Fund | % Sub-Asset Class Target Range (Aggregate) | % Asset Class Target Range |
Fixed Income Core Opportunistic - Active |
100 | 20 | N/A | 10-30 |
Strategy |
||||
A. Cash Holdings
Investment managers may hold idle cash balances arising from investment income and to satisfy transactional needs in the normal course of purchasing and selling securities. In all other respects, the investment managers must strive to be fully invested. Idle cash balances shall be invested by the custodian in money market mutual funds selected by a review of the individual mutual fund’s prospectus by the university controller.
B. Exchange-Traded Funds
Exchange-traded funds, which are passively managed funds traded on leading stock exchanges, may be used to maintain asset class exposure during periods of manager transition or investment strategy implementation. In general, the use of exchange-traded funds will not be recommended if the transaction costs (brokerage commissions) would outweigh the potential benefits. Exchange-traded funds will be executed through the brokerage services of SUEF’s custodian bank.
C. Rebalancing
The equity, fixed income, and alternatives portions of the SUEF should normally represent approximately 65% (33% US, 27% international, 5% emerging markets), 20%, and 15% respectively, of total SUEF assets at market value. Although the actual percentage may fluctuate with market conditions, fluctuations in excess of plus or minus 5% of the target percent for the sub-asset classes (e.g. large cap equity, small cap equity), and plus or minus 10% for the broad asset classes (US equity, international equity, emerging markets equity, fixed income, alternatives) (see Chart A above) will be reallocated by the university controller among the affected investment strategies to reestablish an appropriate balance. [For the sub-asset classes that have a target percentage less than 5%, the minimum target range is zero.] This should be accomplished first by distributing future additions and withdrawals necessary to bring the allocation within tactical ranges but not necessarily back to the strategic target. If the tactical ranges can not be accomplished through the distribution of additions and withdrawals, shifting of assets across portfolios may be required. In general, rebalancing will not be recommended if the imbalance is expected to be short-lived or the transaction costs would outweigh the benefits. These asset allocation ranges and strategies as detailed in Chart A above are subject to change by the Board based on recommendations from the Committee; however, it is anticipated that changes will generally be infrequent.
D. Review
The Committee shall review the asset allocation mix of the SUEF portfolio on a periodic basis and will ascertain that the SUEF not only conforms to the desired target and ranges, but also that the target and ranges remain suitable and represent the optimal asset allocation mix for the SUEF going forward.
III. Manager Specific Investment Guidelines and Performance Standards
The following are specific guidelines and performance standards for each mandate within the SUEF. Each investment manager shall invest SUEF assets in accordance with its stated investment philosophy/strategy and the specific guidelines stated in this section, and is expected to meet or exceed the performance standards as recommended by the Committee and established by the Board.
Investment vehicles that may be considered for each mandate include separately managed accounts, commingled pooled funds, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and alternative investment vehicles such as fund of funds strategies and limited partnerships. The providers of investment funds selected by the Committee and the Board may include banks, insurance companies, and regulated investment companies.
The reference to “portfolio” in this section only applies to the specific guidelines for each mandate.
If a strategy is invested in a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or commingled pooled vehicle, the investment guidelines stated within the mutual fund’s prospectus, the exchange-traded fund’s prospectus or commingled fund’s investment guidelines, respectively, will supersede the specific guidelines in this section.
U.S. Large Cap Index
Performance Standard
1Net of effect of expense ratio.
Some tracking error may occur as a result of rebalancing, corporate actions, reconstitution of the index, and management fees.
Permissible Investments
Permissible investments shall be defined as the following:
Prohibited Investments
Securities specifically prohibited from purchase are the following:
Performance Standard
|
Rank in the upper half of the U.S. Large Cap Growth Equity Universe |
While not explicitly stated as a performance standard, risk-adjusted performance of the portfolio will be measured by the information ratio over the periods specified above. The information ratio is calculated by dividing the portfolio excess return (alpha) by the portfolio’s tracking error relative to the index. It is expected that if the volatility of the portfolio (a measure of risk) is greater than that of the benchmark then a commensurate amount of value added above the benchmark is achieved. This will be reflected by an improvement in the portfolio’s information ratio.
Permissible Investments
Permissible investments shall be defined as the following:
Prohibited Investments
Securities specifically prohibited from purchase are the following:
Performance Standard
|
Rank in the upper half of the U.S. Large Cap Value Equity Universe |
While not explicitly stated as a performance standard, risk-adjusted performance of the portfolio will be measured by the information ratio over the periods specified above. The information ratio is calculated by dividing the portfolio excess return (alpha) by the portfolio’s tracking error relative to the index. It is expected that if the volatility of the portfolio (a measure of risk) is greater than that of the benchmark then a commensurate amount of value added above the benchmark is achieved. This will be reflected by an improvement in the portfolio’s information ratio.
Permissible Investments
Permissible investments shall be defined as the following:
Prohibited Investments
Securities specifically prohibited from purchase are the following:
U.S. Small Cap Value Equities
Performance Standard
|
Rank in the upper half of the U.S. Small Cap Value Equity Universe |
While not explicitly stated as a performance standard, risk-adjusted performance of the portfolio will be measured by the information ratio over the periods specified above. The information ratio is calculated by dividing the portfolio excess return (alpha) by the portfolio’s tracking error relative to the index. It is expected that if the volatility of the portfolio (a measure of risk) is greater than that of the benchmark then a commensurate amount of value added above the benchmark is achieved. This will be reflected by an improvement in the portfolio’s information ratio.
Permissible Investments
Permissible investments shall be defined as the following:
Prohibited investments
Securities specifically prohibited from purchase are:
Other Investment Guidelines
Performance Standard
While not explicitly stated as a performance standard, risk-adjusted performance of the portfolio will be measured by the information ratio over the periods specified above. The information ratio is calculated by dividing the portfolio excess return (alpha) by the portfolio’s tracking error relative to the index. It is expected that if the volatility of the portfolio (a measure of risk) is greater than that of the benchmark then a commensurate amount of value added above the benchmark is achieved. This will be reflected by an improvement in the portfolio’s information ratio.
Permissible Investments
Permissible investments shall be defined as the following:
Prohibited Investments
Securities specifically prohibited from purchase are:
International Growth Equities
Performance Standard
|
Rank in the upper half of the International Growth Equity Universe |
While not explicitly stated as a performance standard, risk-adjusted performance of the portfolio will be measured by the information ratio over the periods specified above. The information ratio is calculated by dividing the portfolio excess return (alpha) by the portfolio’s tracking error relative to the index. It is expected that if the volatility of the portfolio (a measure of risk) is greater than that of the benchmark then a commensurate amount of value added above the benchmark is achieved. This will be reflected by an improvement in the portfolio’s information ratio.
Permissible Investments
Permissible investments shall be defined as the following:
Derivatives
Derivatives may be used for the following purposes:
Derivatives may not be used for the following purposes:
Prohibited Investments
Securities specifically prohibited from purchase are:
International Value Equities
Performance Standard
|
Horizon |
Index |
Universe |
|
Rolling 3 and 5-year periods |
Exceed the MSCI ACWI Ex-U.S. Value Index |
Rank in the upper half of the International Value Equity Universe |
While not explicitly stated as a performance standard, risk-adjusted performance of the portfolio will be measured by the information ratio over the periods specified above. The information ratio is calculated by dividing the portfolio excess return (alpha) by the portfolio’s tracking error relative to the index. It is expected that if the volatility of the portfolio (a measure of risk) is greater than that of the benchmark then a commensurate amount of value added above the benchmark is achieved. This will be reflected by an improvement in the portfolio’s information ratio.
Permissible Investments
Permissible investments shall be defined as the following:
Derivatives
Derivatives may be used for the following purposes:
Derivatives may not be used for the following purposes:
Prohibited Investments
Securities specifically prohibited from purchase are:
Other Investment Guidelines
Emerging Markets Index
Performance Standard
|
Horizon |
Index1 |
Universe |
|
Rolling 3 and 5-year periods |
Match the MSCI Emerging Markets Index |
N/A |
1Net of effect of expense ratio.
Some tracking error may occur as a result of rebalancing, corporate actions, reconstitution of the index, and management fees.
Permissible Investments
Permissible investments shall be defined as the following:
Prohibited Investments
Securities specifically prohibited from purchase are:
Fixed Income Core Opportunistic
Performance Standard
1Net of effect of expense ratio.
While not explicitly stated as a performance standard, risk-adjusted performance of the portfolio will be measured by the information ratio over the periods specified above. The information ratio is calculated by dividing the portfolio excess return (alpha) by the portfolio’s tracking error relative to the index. It is expected that if the volatility of the portfolio (a measure of risk) is greater than that of the benchmark then a commensurate amount of value added above the benchmark is achieved. This will be reflected by an improvement in the portfolio’s information ratio.
Permissible Investments
Permissible investments shall be defined as the following:
Other Investment Guidelines
Alternative Investments - Hedge Fund of Funds
Performance Standard
|
Absolute return goal of at least 8-10% annually while limiting standard deviation to that of the Lehman Aggregate Index |
1Net of effect of all fees.
Permissible Investments
Permissible investments shall be defined by the investment manager according to the strategy specified for the fund.
Prohibited Investments
Securities specifically prohibited from purchase are specified by the investment managers to include, but are not limited to:
Other Investment Guidelines
The investment manager will endeavor to invest in a diversified group of relative value and risk-controlled strategies. Upon full capital commitment to the Fund, 35-45 managers/different strategies are expected.
Alternative Investments – Real Estate
Performance Standard
1Net of effect of all fees.
While not explicitly stated as a performance standard, risk-adjusted performance of the portfolio will be measured by the information ratio over the periods specified above. The information ratio is calculated by dividing the portfolio excess return (alpha) by the portfolio’s tracking error relative to the index. It is expected that if the volatility of the portfolio (a measure of risk) is greater than that of the benchmark then a commensurate amount of value added above the benchmark is achieved. This will be reflected by an improvement in the portfolio’s information ratio.
Permissible Investments
Permissible investments shall be defined as the following:
A. Private real estate equity, equity-oriented debt, mortgages, construction loans, mezzanine debt on real estate, and private investment vehicles in such investments designed for tax-exempt investors. All investments will be located in the U.S.
Other Investment Guidelines
The emphasis of the fund will be on investments in the operating stage of their life cycle; however, equity investments in the development, leasing, and redevelopment stages may also be considered in minority positions in the portfolio. The investment manager will endeavor to invest in a group of properties diversified by sector type and geographical region.
Alternative Investments - Commodities
Performance Standard
1Net of effect of all fees.
Permissible Investments
Permissible investments shall be defined by the investment manager according to the strategy specified for the fund but generally include commodity index futures contracts and swaps, individual commodity and short- to intermediate-term fixed income securities.
Prohibited Investments
IV. Trading and Brokerage Policy
All trading of securities by investment managers will be placed with institutional broker-dealers, including the use of electronic crossing networks (ECNs), with the aim of obtaining the best price and best execution, taking into account all factors influencing pricing and execution, as well as the value of all brokerage services received for the benefit of the SUEF. The policy of best price and best execution is intended to mean that investment managers shall use professional judgment in the selection of brokers and the commissions paid. Investment managers should be prepared to provide evidence that they are attempting to deliver investment results at the lowest possible level of transaction costs, including the market impact of their trades, and considering the value of all services provided to the SUEF for its commission dollars. “Institutional broker-dealers”, as referenced herein, means firms which customarily perform larger trades for an institutional clientele. Such broker-dealers may trade on the floor of the various national and regional stock exchanges, or may trade in the third and fourth markets, performing transactions outside of normal market trading. In addition, the SUEF may use brokerage services of its custodian bank to effect the purchase and sale of exchange-traded funds or mutual funds to implement the investment polices of the SUEF.
On or after June 30 of each year, each investment manager shall provide the university controller with a report which details the names and addresses of the brokerage firms and/or ECNs used by the investment manager during the preceding fiscal year to execute purchases, sales, and exchanges of securities under management for the SUEF. This report shall also contain: the total number and percentage of all transactions directed to each such firm and/or ECN; the aggregate dollar amount and percentage of such activity by category; and the total fees paid to the brokerage firm and/or ECN and the average cost per transaction.
A. Soft Dollar Policy
No investment manager shall enter a soft-dollar arrangement for trades on behalf of the SUEF for the payment of third party services without the prior written approval of the university controller. In the event an investment manager receives soft dollars, these monies shall be used for the benefit of the SUEF and not for the benefit of the investment manager’s firm. Investment managers will be required to furnish to the university controller, upon request, a report detailing their soft dollar activity and must include: broker name, total commissions paid, effective aggregate commission rate, multiple or conversion ration, services acquired, uses of such services, and types of clients benefiting from these services. The investment managers shall be governed by the Soft Dollar Policy of the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) Institute.
B. Commission Recapture Policy
The Committee may require that investment managers participate in a Commission Recapture Arrangement. An investment manager may be exempt based on factors such as: ability to achieve best execution, investment style, assets under management and external research requirements. It is expected and understood that the specific target level of direction should not interfere with the investment managers’ ability to achieve best execution. Funds generated under the Commission Recapture Agreement will be applied to operating expenses incurred by the SUEF. Investment managers participating in a Commission Recapture Arrangement are required to send to the university controller, on a quarterly basis, reports detailing the level of commission recapture activity.
C. Transition Management
To minimize the transaction costs and market impact of the transfer of assets when terminating or hiring investment managers with separately managed accounts, the SUEF may use the services of a transition manager. The transition manager will seek to identify and manage the risks and costs of the asset transfer, providing an estimate in advance and a report after execution which outlines the actual transaction costs compared with the estimate.
D. Proxy Voting
Unless instructed otherwise by the State University, each investment manager is empowered to vote all proxies for securities held by the SUEF portfolio for which they are responsible. On or after June 30 of each year, each investment manager shall provide the university controller with a report detailing the results of the proxy voting.
E. Social Investing
The Board may, from time to time, restrict the investment (both direct and indirect) in companies that manage operations in a line of business or conduct business in geographic regions of the world that present social concerns to the Board (e.g., human rights, environmental issues, unfair business or labor practices, etc.).
V. Selection, Evaluation, and Review
A. Review of Overall Program
The Committee, with the assistance of the university controller and the investment consultant, will review the overall investment program on an ongoing basis. Key issues reviewed will include the following:
The university controller and the Committee will also review the performance of the investment managers, custodian, and investment consultant to determine whether they have performed in accordance with their stated investment approaches and responsibilities.
B. Reporting Requirements – Investment Managers
On a quarterly basis, each investment manager will be expected to provide the following:
Investment managers will be required to meet with the Committee, the university controller, or investment consultant, as requested. Additionally, managers need to report on any activity that would cause an inability to comply with these Guidelines.
C. Reporting Requirements – Custodian
On a monthly and annual basis, the custodian will be expected to provide the following:
D. Reporting Requirements – Investment Consultant
On a quarterly basis, the investment consultant will be expected to provide a written review of the performance of the SUEF, which includes the following:
E. Guidelines for the Selection, Review, and Termination of Investment Managers, Custodian, and Investment Consultant
1. Selection Process
In selecting investment managers, custodian, and investment consultant to meet the needs of the SUEF, a specific process of selection and evaluation of candidate firms is followed. In this process, the University will follow the State’s and its procurement policies, rules and practices. This includes a competitive process through the issuance of a request for proposal (RFP) to secure these services. Candidate organizations for a given role are identified according to criteria established by the Committee and the university controller. Evaluation of organizations includes an analysis of organizational structure, professional personnel, investment philosophy and process, portfolio characteristics, fees, and performance, as well as the ability to adequately serve the University’s specific needs.
The selection of an investment manager also considers the correlation with other existing investment managers in the program, and with the defining market index for the role. Consideration is given to the benefits of diversification within a role by investment style or focus.
Candidate organizations as identified, including those meeting minimum qualifications through the open bidding process, must pass through a due diligence and qualification process. Once qualified, scoring workbooks will be prepared by University staff for each candidate firm. A score will be developed for each firm based upon the specific factors as outlined in the University-prepared Request for Proposal. The university controller and University staff with the assistance of the investment consultant will nominate the highest scoring and most appropriate firm(s) for final consideration by the Committee, and generally after a formal presentation by one or more candidate organizations. The Committee will then recommend a firm or firms to the full Board for appointment.
2. Review and Termination Process – Investment Managers
Investment managers may be placed on “watch” status, replaced or terminated whenever the Committee loses confidence in the management of the strategy, when the characteristics of the portfolio no longer satisfy the desired or expected elements of the mandate, or the current style is no longer deemed appropriate by the Committee. The following are some examples of reasons that may cause the Committee to lose confidence in a manager:
The investment consultant will provide recommendations relating to investment managers, which may fall into any one of the following three categories:
The Committee will review the investment consultant’s or university controller’s recommendation to either place an investment manager on watch or terminate a relationship. Managers will generally be placed on watch status for a period of time before a decision to terminate the relationship is made. There may be, however, circumstances under which the Committee may determine to terminate a manager without placing them on watch first.
An investment manager may be placed on watch after consideration is given to the following factors:
The watch period may be established for as many as three quarters, for a maximum one-year total watch duration.
3. Review and Termination Process – Custodian
Custodians may be placed on “watch” status, replaced or terminated whenever the Committee loses confidence in the management of the SUEF’s custodial account or when the quality and/or level of service no longer satisfies the needs of the SUEF. The following are some examples of reasons that may cause the Committee to lose confidence in a custodian:
If the Committee or university controller loses confidence in the custodian, for any reason, the investment consultant may be retained to perform an evaluation/diagnostic on the custodian and its services to the SUEF. The investment consultant will provide recommendations in its report relating to custodians, which may fall into any one of the following three categories:
The Committee will review the investment consultant’s and/or university controller’s recommendation to either place a custodian on watch or terminate a relationship. A custodian will generally be placed on watch status for a period of time before a decision to terminate the relationship is made. There may be, however, circumstances under which the Committee may determine to terminate a custodian without placing them on watch first.
A custodian may be placed on watch after consideration is given to the following factors:
The watch period may be established for as many as three quarters, for a maximum one-year total watch-duration.
If the Committee or university controller loses confidence in the investment consultant, for any reason, the Committee will request the university controller meet with, review, and provide a recommendation on the investment consultant. The Committee will review the university controller’s recommendation to either place the investment consultant on watch or terminate a relationship. Investment consultants will generally be placed on watch status for a period of time before a decision to terminate the relationship is made. There may be, however, circumstances under which the Committee may determine to terminate an investment consultant without placing them on watch first.
An investment consultant may be placed on watch after consideration is given to the following factors:
The watch period may be established for as many as three quarters, for a maximum one-year total watch duration.
There are no forms relevant to this procedure.
There are no related procedures relevant to this procedure.
There is no other information relevant to this procedure.
There is no authority relevant to this procedure.
State University of New York Board of Trustees Resolution No. 04-152, adopted December 14, 2004 approved revisions to the State University of New York’s Investment Objectives and Guidelines by placing restrictions on investments in U.S. equities portfolios and clarifying investments of Real Estate investment Trusts (REITs) and security trades.
State University of New York Board of Trustees Resolution No. 04-127, adopted September 14, 2004 approved revisions to the State University of New York’s Investment Objectives and Guidelines by changing the target allocation for the mid cap equity strategy and the target allocation for the S & P 500 Index.
State University of New York Board of Trustees Resolution No. 02-63, adopted May 21, 2002 authorized the chair of the Investment Committee and the vice chancellor for finance and business to take appropriate action to secure the services of Mercer Investment Consulting to provide investment management consultant services with respect to the administration and management of the State University Endowment Fund, the 403(b) (7) program and the optional retirement program.
State University of New York Board of Trustees Resolution No. 00-57, adopted April 25, 2000 authorized the chair of the Investment Committee and the vice chancellor for finance and business to take preliminary action for the development, establishment, and administration of a custodial account program for the benefit of employees of the State University of New York and community colleges under the program of the State University.
State University of New York Board of Trustees Resolution No. 97-33, adopted February 25, 1997 revised the State University of New York’s Investment Objectives and Guidelines with respect to the reinvestment of Endowment Fund income and the credit classification of certain fixed income securities and to permit and regulate investment of a portion of the Endowment Fund in international equity securities.
State University of New York Board of Trustees Resolution No. 94-1, adopted January 27, 1994 approved the recommendation of the Investment Committee to remove the ban on investing SUNY endowments in securities and other financial instruments issued by South African governmental units, companies and other institutions doing business in South Africa.
State University of New York Board of Trustees Resolution No. 92-239, adopted November 18, 1992 approved revisions to the State University’s Investment Objectives and Guidelines, approved an “Addendum to The State University of New York Statement of Investment Objectives and Guidelines For International Securities,” and authorized the chair of the Investment Committee and the senior vice chancellor to secure the services of Scudder, Stevens and Clark as international equities managers.
State University of New York Board of Trustees Resolution No. 63-131, adopted June 13, 1963, repealed Resolution No. 59-23 and authorized the Executive Committee, with a Sub-Committee for investment management, to act in name of the State University of New York and on behalf of the Board in management of endowment and other funds held on behalf of the State University or of any institution.
There are no appendices relevant to this procedure.