M E M O R A N D U M March 22, 2011 To: Members of the Board of Trustees From: Pedro A. Noguera, Chair, Education, College Readiness and Success Committee Subject: Approval of Proposal to Establish the ROADS Charter School I (Brooklyn) Action Requested The proposed resolution authorizes the grant of a new charter to the proposed ROADS Charter School I pursuant to Education Law subdivision 2852(9-a). Resolution I recommend that the Board of Trustees adopt the following resolution: Whereas the Charter Schools Institute (the “Institute”), acting on behalf of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with the New York Charter Schools Act of 1998 (as amended, the “Act”), issued a request for proposals (“RFP”) to establish new charter schools on January 3, 2011, in response to which ROADS Charter School I, to be located in Brooklyn, submitted a proposal that the Institute reviewed, scored and ranked, and recommends for approval (the “Recommended Proposal”) as set forth in the Institute’s Summary of Findings and Recommendations report for the proposed school (copy on file in the Office of the Senior Vice Chancellor and Secretary of the University and in the Albany office of the Institute), which the Board of Trustees has reviewed; now, therefore, be it Resolved that the Recommended Proposal rigorously demonstrates that the Proposal has met the following criteria: (1) the proposed charter school would meet or exceed enrollment and retention targets, to be prescribed by the Board of Trustees, of students with disabilities, English language learners, and students who are eligible applicants for the federal free and reduced price lunch program; and (2) that the applicant has conducted public outreach, in conformity with a thorough and meaningful public review process prescribed by the Board of Trustees, to solicit community input regarding the proposed charter school and to address comments received from the impacted community concerning the educational and programmatic needs of students; and, be it further Resolved that the Board of Trustees has granted priority to the Recommended Proposal based on a scoring rubric that best demonstrates how proposed schools will achieve the objectives set forth in Education Law subdivision 2852(9-a)(c); and, be it further Resolved that the Recommended Proposal and the school described therein meet the requirements of the Act (as amended) and all other applicable laws, rules and regulations; and, be it further Resolved that the applicant submitting the Recommended Proposal and the founding team described therein demonstrate the ability to operate the proposed school in an educationally and fiscally sound manner; and, be it further Resolved that approving the Recommended Proposal is likely to improve student learning and achievement and materially further the purposes set out in Education Law subdivision 2850(2); and, be it further Resolved that the Recommended Proposal be, and hereby is, approved; and, be it further Resolved that the Institute be, and hereby is, directed to: (1) enter into a proposed charter with the applicant of the Recommended Proposal, which shall include such assurances and terms as the Institute shall deem necessary and appropriate; and (2) thereafter to submit such proposed charter no later than November 1, 2011 as required by the Act to the Board of Regents for issuance by the Board of Regents on or before December 31, 2011. Background Amendments to the New York Charter Schools Act of 1998 (as amended, the “Act”), passed on May 28, 2010, increased the cap on the number of charter schools to be formed in New York by adding a new class of charters that must be issued through requests for proposals (“RFPs”). Only the Board of Trustees and the Board of Regents may issue RFPs with each entity allowed to approve 130 new charters, only 57 of which may be located in New York City. Prior to approval of this resolution the Board of Trustees has approved two proposals for schools to be located in New York City; leaving 128 charters to be issued through the RFP process with 55 to be located in New York City. RFPs may only be posted on certain dates for a maximum number of charters set by statute. The RFP date for the proposal to be approved by this resolution was January 1, 2011 (effectively January 3, the first business day after the 1st) and the maximum number of charters the Board of Trustees may approve as a result of the RFP is 63 (33 plus 30 remaining from the August 2010 RFP). The Charter Schools Institute (the “Institute”) released and broadly distributed draft RFP for public comment on November 16, 2010, held a public meeting in three locations across the state to solicit verbal comments on November 29, 2010, carefully reviewed all comments, amending the draft RFP as appropriate, and posted a document detailing its evaluation and response to public comments on January 3, 2011, the same day it released the final RFP. Two proposals were received on January 14, 2011 in response to the part of the RFP that sought proposals for early action. After review, scoring in accordance with a rubric required to be developed by Education Law subdivision 2852(9-a), and ranking, the Institute recommended both proposals for approval. The Institute, acting on behalf of the Board of Trustees, conducted a rigorous review of each proposal and published its findings and recommendations in a Summary of Findings and Recommendations for the proposed schools (copy on file in the Office of the Senior Vice Chancellor and Secretary of the University and in the Albany office of the Institute, and available at www.newyorkcharters.org), which was made available to the Board of Trustees. In addition to meeting all of the requirements for non-RFP charters, the amended Act requires additional RFP findings that are reflected in the resolution. For the proposal listed above, the Institute, pursuant to Education Law subdivision 2857(1), notified the school district in which the charter school is proposed to be located regarding the receipt of a proposal to establish a school (copy on file in the Albany Office of the Institute). As of March 8, 2011, no comments in response had been received by the Board of Trustees. Board Resolution -3- March 22, 2011 2